Recent Posts
-
Autocracy Defeats Neoliberalism
November 14, 2024
-
History… We’re Soaking in It!
October 2, 2024
-
A Numbing Spectacle
September 22, 2024
-
War Is the Air We Breathe
July 15, 2024
-
Silicon Valley: A Living History
May 6, 2024
-
And Yet, We Go On
April 22, 2024
-
It IS Happening Here
February 16, 2024
-
General Ludd to General Intellect
January 11, 2024
-
Temporal and Geographic Edges
December 26, 2023
-
The Root of All Evil
October 13, 2023
|
Golden Gate Park a few months ago…
I guess it’s oddly appropriate to find myself two hours into the limbo of the jury duty room at San Francisco’s Hall of (In)justice. The clerks have ordered us to remain here several times while apologizing that the courts just aren’t ready for us. Pretty normal I suppose but more vivid evidence of the decaying civic institutions that will now creak and groan and probably crumble as a formal and popularly elected autocracy takes hold. (At the end of the day they let me go due to scheduling conflicts with the trial length.)
I didn’t vote for Harris or Trump and haven’t voted for a president since Jimmy Carter in 1976! I just don’t believe in the whole model and it feels hypocritical to pretend otherwise. My voting fits best under the rubric of “harm reduction” but I understand why so many people rejected Harris and the Democrats, especially the corporatist version they presented in this campaign (much the same as the failed 2016 Clinton campaign). Really they should be ashamed to have embraced the fuckin’ Cheneys the way they did! Dick Cheney’s endorsement should have been loudly rejected. The dude’s a war criminal and profiteer and an all around horrible human being. His daughter is not much better, albeit her hands are a bit less dirty. Still.
Neoliberalism is dead this time! Liberal democracy might be too. Trump did promise his Christian supporters that if they’d just show up and elect him that they’d never have to vote again. A lot of us have glibly assumed that the system needs the empty ritual of regular elections as a way to prove its popular support and legitimacy. Maybe, maybe not! Maybe “legitimacy” has morphed and will now be achieved by delivering the right balance of (a little) bread and (a lot of) circuses to the hungry masses. And one thing we can be sure of—Trump and his acolytes are enthusiastically planning vast Theaters of Cruelty to feed their followers’ desire for punishment, for pain infliction, for degradation, and above all, putting women and blacks “in their place.”
American culture—whether Hollywood gore-fests, or the multi-billion dollar video game industry (dominated by Pentagon-friendly products to support the “volunteer” military), or the brutal UFC ring fights, or the absurd “pro wrestling” circuit, or every Sunday NFL football, or any of a number of other attention-absorbing, money-making horrors—saturates society with endless violence. The rampant gun violence, daily TV news where “if it bleeds it leads,” and the distorted portrayal of a non-existent crime epidemic all contribute to the lonely, fearful isolation that traps ever more Americans.
Much has been made of the breakdown of a shared reality. If it’s true that door-to-door canvassing couldn’t dent the world views of people getting all their news on social media or from Fox, then indeed a mass delusional psychosis has gripped millions. Truth-telling is not an effective antidote to this unprecedented system of propaganda and mind control. Those of us who remain outside of their control are a shrinking minority—and many dissenters may face criminalization and state violence in the months and years to come. It’s a bleak picture, to be sure.
Taking bleak despair to a whole other level is Franco Berardi, aka “Bifo.” Writing now on Substack he posted his “Endgame” on November 9 (I rearranged the order of these paragraphs):
Despite being, country by country, on the brink of civil war, Western and supremacist peoples are united in the common undertaking of genocide and in the common enterprise of enforced birthing. For a long time we fooled ourselves by listening to fairy tales of a fantastic multitude ready to fight against a fantastic Empire: we didn’t have the intellectual courage to recognize social impotence, and the exhaustion of the psychic energy without which social movements are flashes in the pan.
The triumph of a man who represents in one go the racism of the Ku Klux Klan, mafia criminal profiteering, macho violence and financial absolutism is the best observation point from which to finally look retrospectively at the twentieth century, and to some extent, imagine the lines of evolution of the twenty-first. The Trump-triumph is the final proof that the workers’ movement has made a colossal mistake since the end of the nineteenth century, accepting the terrain of politics as the terrain for emancipation. Both revolutionary Bolshevism and social democratic reformism have accepted the terrain that the bourgeoisie had prepared, and on that terrain they lost all battles up to the point of being definitively erased from the panorama of social evolution. Was there another ground for social autonomy, other than political power? Of course there was: it was daily life, collective existence, which spontaneously tends to desert economic and political totalitarianism.
Workers today are isolated, psychically fragile, incapable of organization and solidarity, because the political Left exchanged autonomy for democracy, and democracy was a fake and a trap. Government based on elections could be a good idea if two conditions were met: the first is the free formation of opinion and will. The second is the effectiveness of political will in determining the lines of development of the economy and therefore of society. Both conditions have never existed in the history of the twentieth century.
Since working on Processed World back in the 1980s, I always thought the abdication of “organized labor” to the agenda(s) of capital was at the heart of the problem. I didn’t think about it in the same terms that Bifo describes above, as a rejection of the whole field of bourgeois democracy as a trap, but I think he’s right. Similar to John Holloway’s rejection of the very category of “worker” as the starting point for revolt, it’s our fundamental humanity that is the basis for our desires and ability to radically transform how we live, and to redesign how we produce life together. Because however dismayed or depressed this election might make anyone feel, the dire reality of climate chaos—spreading droughts and desertification, runaway storms and floods, collapsing agricultural production and destruction of fresh water resources—is a lot worse than the question of which person is fiddling while the planet burns.
Continue reading Autocracy Defeats Neoliberalism
Visiting the Pacific Ocean in late August, an easy bike ride from home…
Last December I wrote a bit about my discovering more deep history around the Pacific. I neglected to mention then my pal Tina’s remarkable atlas Sea Change: An Atlas of Islands in a Rising Ocean. In it she makes her way from island to island around the planet, giving capsule histories and likely scenarios as the oceans continue their inexorable rise. California’s history is fully intertwined with that of the Philippines, Hawaii, Japan, Korea, China, India and the rest of what is lumped together as Asia and the Pacific. Tina’s atlas doesn’t try to untangle all those complicated histories, though she notes many important pieces in passing. In the past few weeks I’ve had the pleasure of diving rather deeply into this.
An incredible book, well over 500 pages, is Alfred McCoy’s 2009 opus Policing America’s Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State. He has popped up in prior blog posts of mine as the author of various works describing the steady unraveling of the US empire (he originally made his name with The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia that revealed the role of the CIA in running heroin during the Vietnam war). This book on the Philippines and US colonialism is a tour de force, and a product of 40 years of close research McCoy carried out during most of his academic life. It covers the initial seizure of the Philippines in 1898 and betrayal of the ongoing war of liberation there, through the many years of developing and perfecting technologized systems of counterinsurgency and colonial repression, up to the post-WWII granting of formal independence, the Marcos martial law regime, the post-martial law “democratic” governments up to Gloria Arroyo’s in the early 2000s, and more. It’s so detailed and is so careful to connect the role of various colonial administrators (starting with future president William Howard Taft, governor of the Philippines in 1901) to their later roles in US domestic politics, that it is incredibly revealing. Perhaps as telling, if you followed any of the news of Philippine President Duterte, who was wildly Trumpian in his denunciations of drug users and criminals and brazen in unleashing the police and military in mass killing campaigns, reading this book you come to realize that he wasn’t such a huge departure from what preceded him in Philippine politics (nor what followed, i.e. “Bongo” Marcos, Jr.). It is a work of deep historiography too. Here McCoy helps illuminate a framework he employs that sets him apart from most historians:
Even this research is still, at this writing, overwhelmed by the sheer mass of dissertations, monographs, histories, textbooks, documentaries, monuments, and museums whose unstated, unwitting aim is to affirm state authority. Through the sum of these endeavors, historians have encircled the nation-state with a sacral barrier that precludes cognizance of its profane margins: systemic violence, institutional corruption, extralegal security operations, and most important, syndicated vice. Many social historians have escaped the nation-state’s hegemony through studies of popular movements among workers, women, or minorities. But few have looked at the state long and hard from its sordid underside—an interstice that is the sum of addiction, avarice, blackmail, cowardice, scandal, torture, venality, and violence. As acolytes of the nation-state, conventional historians turn away from such a disconcerting dimension and often adopt a positive, at times celebratory view of their polity that discourages consideration of the influence of the informal on the formal, the criminal on the powerful, or, in some cases, the colonized on the colonizer. (p. 12)
I will come back to McCoy in a bit. There’s much more to share from his work, and it connects in various ways to other themes I want to expand on. But first let’s bring in Amitav Ghosh’s latest nonfiction work Smoke & Ashes: Opium’s Hidden Histories. This is a work that carefully brings to the forefront the sordid underside McCoy describes above. It also helpfully grants the poppy plant itself historical agency!
The brute fact is that it was a flower that defeated the mightiest military power in human history [the U.S. in Afghanistan]: the opium poppy may be humble in appearance, but it is one of the most powerful Beings that humans have encountered in their time on earth. To be sure, tea, sugarcane, tobacco, rubber, cotton, Yersinia pestis, and many other plants and pathogens have played major roles in human history, some of them over several centuries. But today they are all much diminished in their influence, while the opium poppy is mightier than ever. (p. 112) … in colonizing the poppy fields of Bihar [India], the colonizers have themselves been colonized—by a non-human entity whose intelligence, patience and longevity far exceed that of humans. It is almost as if the elders of the plant kingdom, having concluded that Homo sapiens was too dangerous an animal to be allowed to survive, had given humankind a gift that they knew would be used by the most ruthless and powerful of the species to build economic systems that would slowly, inexorably, bring about the end of their civilization. (p. 250-251) … …opium creates its own temporalities: when opioid epidemics subside, they are followed by periods of amnesia, which, after a few decades, help to rehabilitate opioids all over again. These cycles are another sign of opium’s potency as a historical actor in its own right. (p. 270)
An all too common sight in San Francisco these days, someone in the midst of a “fentanyl freeze.”
San Francisco is famously having a drug problem. It’s decades old, but it is also quite new in that the arrival of synthetic opium in the form of fentanyl has been killing drug users at an unprecedented rate. The anti-overdose drug Narcan is now readily available and many people are carrying it around to try to save the lives of people who are obviously dying on our streets. It can be rather bleak walking past the blocks where police seem to have ushered the most desperate drug users to congregate. It is not uncommon these days to see people in almost any part of town doing the “fentanyl freeze” where they are rooted, standing stock still but bent completely in half as their upper torso has descended towards their knees, unable to sustain an upright position while experiencing the intense high of a fresh dose. It’s very sad, to say the least. But our opioid addiction crisis covers the country, and by all accounts is as bad or worse in many of the most abandoned and poverty-stricken rural areas of the midwest and the south in addition to the inner cities.
Continue reading History… We’re Soaking in It!
I’ve been away from the blog again, this time absorbed in preparing some new content for a 2nd edition of Hidden San Francisco, forthcoming in 2025. But I should be able to crank out a few posts in the next week or two… we’ll see.
The view from my petanque court…
I’m in that part of the population that can’t understand for a second how so many people continue to support Donald Trump. But unlike most of those who I share that sentiment with, I am sure Harris will be a conservative corporate Democrat who earns our wrath within minutes of taking office. For some of us, she earned it already… The local San Francisco BayView newspaper, one of a dozen independent journalistic efforts I’ve recently given small donations to, ran a good interview by Ann Garrison with Bradley Angel of Greenaction where they discussed the emptiness of Harris’s claim to have been a vigorous prosecutor of environmental crimes during her time as SF District Attorney or as California Attorney General. In fact she did very little, and like Obama and Clinton before her, she has the political skill to waffle rightward as needed to defend the profitable interests of her friends and allies while sounding a vaguely populist note that invokes a “caring” facade. It’s really pretty repulsive. But no surprise.
Back when San Francisco still had the Bay Guardian weekly newspaper, it used to rail against the [Willie] Brown-[Phil] Burton Machine that dominated local politics since the late 1960s. Over the years it has persisted and brought along quite a lot of prominent politicians, Kamala Harris being at the current head of the class. Of course Phil Burton died decades ago but Nancy Pelosi ably filled his legislative shoes and between her, Willie Brown, and Dianne Feinstein, they were all skilled at bringing home the bacon to San Francisco one way or another. All are so connected that they are able to make corporate donations rain as needed. Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, and a host of junior politicians coming up behind them are products of this carefully constructed “liberal” faction of corporate-sponsored and -controlled politicians. None will challenge any aspect of the power structure that prevails—not the military-industrial complex, not agribusiness, not the petrochemical/fossil fuel behemoths, and definitely not the new tech monopolists. That’s why the public clamor to fire Lina Kahn at the Federal Trade Commission is making for some riveting theater—how blatantly obedient will Kamala Harris be to her corporate overlords? I already know the answer, unfortunately.
from our always interesting Democracy Wall…
Anyway, as the title of this post has it, this is a truly numbing spectacle. Of course I’d prefer the corporate war-mongering Democrat with tepid climate policies and a likelihood of supporting women’s health care over the deranged Fascist wannabe dictator who wants to burn everything to the ground as fast as possible while taking his cut of everyone else’s business… what a choice! But if you are in the throes of the quadrennial madness that thinks it makes a really big difference which faction of the ruling class is running the show, well, I’m as puzzled by that as I am by the imperviousness of Trump’s support.
On the Latino USA podcast with the always wonderful Maria Hinajosa they had a roundtable about journalism and Latinos with some veteran reporters. They acknowledged that journalism has shrunk in the past decades—less resources to cover news, and narrower intellectual space in which to do it. No surprise. In fact, I’ve been thinking about this sort of by accident over the past month as I increasingly tune out the mainstream news of the New York Times, Washington Post, SF Chronicle, and especially CNN, MSNBC and the pure propaganda of Fox. The endless hysteria over breaking (non)news, the obsession with (meaningless) polls and the horse race, the weather catastrophes each treated as a one-off as though the climate catastrophe isn’t at the root of the endless floods, fires, droughts, and refugee crises… the biased coverage of wars, or the complete omission of any mention of them!… journalism, owned by a few major media corporations, is not even entertaining! And it’s a long way from what I would consider legitimate journalism.
Luckily there are a number of credible alternatives if you want to seek them out. Harry Shearer’s hilarious weekly Le Show does a great job of presenting a lot of news that disappears before you ever hear about it (especially regarding the nuclear industry, microplastics, the Olympics, and “news of the Godly” i.e. church scandals). I find myself glad to connect with Matt Stoller’s reporting on monopolies (on Substack); David Sirota’s news site The Lever and his new podcast called The Master Plan about the systematic corruption of the U.S. government going back to the 1960s and early 1970s; The Intercept; DropSite News; Ken Klippenstein on the National Security State; Gil Duran at The Nerd Reich; regular essays on TomDispatch; Ed Zitron’s often hilariously bitter podcast and newsletter Better Offline; 404 Media, a collective of several journalists who left various online sources; San Francisco’s go-to source of news has remarkably become none other than Mission Local who have been doing great coverage on the local elections among other things; and of course there are all the old standbys: local radio stations KALW-FM, KPFA-FM, KPOO-FM, shows like Democracy Now, and the less rushed journalism available from The Nation, The New Yorker, New York Review of Books, Mother Jones; neighborhood newspapers in San Francisco like the aforementioned BayView, and El Tecolote and Potrero View.
I’m sure I’ve left a few off my list that I’ll think about later… the point is that I’m having to do a lot of á la carte shopping to get my news. I have to sort through a dozen online sources and about that many podcasts, and another dozen or so print magazines that arrive regularly in my mailbox. How I wish there was a decent newspaper and a solid TV newscast I could get all these sources compiled and edited through! Has someone invented that yet?
I’ll be back in a few days with a more typical post, talking about a bunch of books!
|
|